(Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court has blocked Bayer AG from selling an agricultural weed killer in the United States, the latest setback for a business already fighting an expensive legal battle over another product.The lawsuit was among those German-based Bayer inherited when it bought Monsanto for $63 billion in 2018.
The EPA originally approved dicamba in 2016 for two years and then re-affirmed that decision in 2018 for another two years through the 2020 growing season. Wegen angeblicher Krebsrisiken von Monsantos Unkrautvernichter Glyphosat sieht sich …
To qualify for a dicamba lawsuit, you must be a commercial farmer or landowner whose crop yield has suffered losses because of dicamba in 2015, 2016 or 2017. “It is not a simple or straight-forward process,” Luke said, pointing to “You have to go to each individual field,” he said. The herbicide is also at the heart of hundreds of lawsuits filed over the damage. Because of these defects, these products with dicamba are not fit or safe for their intended purpose. Bayer hat bereits kündigte Berufung gegen das Dicamba-Urteil angekündigt.
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency substantially understated the risks related to the use of dicamba, a chemical found in herbicides sold by Bayer and rivals that are sprayed on genetically engineered soybeans and cotton. Ein erster verlorener Prozess, eine erste Strafe: Auch mit dem Unkrautvernichter Dicamba hat Bayer ein nicht zu unterschätzendes Risiko in der Produktpalette seiner Pflanzenchemie-Sparte. Many of those seek to be class-action lawsuits that would represent the thousands of farmers – largely growers of non-resistant soybeans but also specialty crop farmers – whose fields have allegedly been damaged.Missouri peach farmer who alleged that his orchard is going out of businessAaron Hager, an associate professor of weed science at the University of Illinois, said the science points to the fact that dicamba is moving off-target and harming crops, no matter what Bayer says.Last week, a federal jury rejected the companies’ argument, siding with a The Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting uses cookies to improve your experience. Denn zum einen geht es dabei nur um Ernteausfälle, nicht jedoch um Krankheiten, die zum Tod führen können.
Dicamba wurde, genau wie Glyphosat, von Monsanto entwickelt, dem Konzern den Bayer 2018 übernommen hat. The reason was that some weeds had developed resistance to glyphosate, the main ingredient in the Roundup products.Fire Burns Armenian Church Building Overnight in San Francisco; Arson Suspected“We hold that the EPA substantially understated risks that it acknowledged and failed entirely to acknowledge other risks,” Circuit Judge William Fletcher wrote for the court.©2020 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.SAN FRANCISCO (CBS SF) – A federal appeals court in San Francisco on Wednesday overturned the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s approval of the use of dicamba, a weed killer used on millions of acres of soybean and cotton crops.The Center for Food Safety said in a statement that more than 25 million pounds of the now-disapproved dicamba had been set to be sprayed on American farms this summer.
The jury awarded Bader Farms $265 million in … The herbicides are known to drift away and damage other crops that are not resistant. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency registration for the dicamba-based herbicides expires at the end of the year. But in 2017, Monsanto and BASF released new formulations of dicamba designed to be sprayed over new genetically modified soybean and cotton crops and touted to be less volatile. Earlier this year, a Missouri jury awarded a peach farmer $265 million for damage from dicamba …
“The question is, what do they owe for that damage?”The dicamba litigation has parallels to Roundup cases, where tens of thousands of people have alleged they were diagnosed with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma from using the Monsanto product. It poses difficult issues for settlement,” Downing said.“The road map has been laid for plaintiffs on how to win this,” said Paul Lesko, an attorney at Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane, which is representing 27 clients in the multidistrict litigation.Like in the Bader case, Bayer’s defense will be “in a general sense” that inspections of those fields didn’t find dicamba damage, said Chris Hohn, an attorney with Thompson Coburn, which is representing Bayer. A federal jury in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, has ruled in favor of Bader Farms, a Campbell, Missouri, peach farm, in its dicamba lawsuit against Bayer and BASF. Dicamba Lawsuits Against Monsanto on the Rise.
An der Lösung des Glyphosat-Problems hängt möglicherweise auch die Zukunft von Vorstandschef Werner Baumann.
Of that amount, $15 million is in the form of compensatory damages for what the jury ruled was the actual amount of damage caused to the peach trees grown by Bader Farms. The herbicide is also at the heart of hundreds of lawsuits filed over the damage.