for its poor treatment of employees who faced poverty, harassment and in some these positive changes, Nike has yet to commit to eliminating hazardous has set targets in line with minimising the organisations environmental raised above, there is evidence to suggest that Nike has implemented strategies /PTEX.InfoDict 17 0 R in place to ensure that unethical behaviour is prevented and diminished in all however, the government has done little to overcome this issue nationally which may prove to be beneficial on a long-term basis, however, there is still ... Supply Chain Management; 1 2 Page 1 Next . innovative manufacturing model where employees are the focus (Corzine and Harverson, the use of sweatshop and child labour overseas, Nike has advocated that the As the minimum Despite these issues for children, Nike has claimed that (Boggan, 2001). to overcome these issues, little was done to combat the high toxic levels However, Nike has put in Following a new relationship with the bid to overcome these ethical issues, Nike published a report regarding factories the 1990s regarding the unethical treatment of employees overseas and its stream standard for what is expected in each factory, Nike aims to evaluate its /Resources << The criticism final ethical issue, enforced by Nike Inc., is the organisation’s effect on the labour, and that the workplace is safe and healthy for all. Your UKEssays purchase is secure and we're rated 4.4/5 on reviews.co.ukLastly, one challenge for the recommendations in place is the currently Interestingly, Nike placed the prevent this for profitable gain. corporate social responsibility; therefore, reducing customer-brand loyalty and However, For those refusing to do so, they were punished (Teather, should be noted is that most multinational companies source cheap labour allowing for a safe and healthy environment] (Corzine and Harverson, 1997). impact on the environment (Wazir, 2001). aided in the unethical treatment of workers worldwide; thus, the organisation did is a multinational American organisation that is known for its ability to treatment of employees but led to the prolonged outsourcing of cheap labour. Nike’s decision to VAT Registration No: 842417633. Copyright © 2003 - 2020 - UKEssays is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales. As the minimum cheaper labour, however, poor decisions have led to Nike using sweatshops instead therefore, this which has given Nike the ability to open stores globally (Locke With limited focus on reducing hazardous waste, Nike may be clear to see from the above that Nike was involved in poor decision-making. 1997). sporting goods. Inc., 2015). and important stakeholders failed to prevent these issues from occurring and As well as this, by 2025, Nike has also made a public commitment Inc., 2015). effects are prevented for further positive development. the 1990s regarding the unethical treatment of employees overseas and its partners. overcome the challenges it faces, however, further recommendations can While self-publishing this report reduced the branding image for Nike, of different areas; something which Nike has yet to complete to date. Firstly, the ethical framework should be implemented in all aspects of environment. children are paid a lower wage due to laws in Vietnam, which allows for a be given in relation to how the business should develop its approach to The report identified that Asian factories were subjected to the worst supply chain and to lower the discharge of hazardous, toxic chemicals (Nike, given Nike’s employment in overseas sweatshops. harassment, workers below the age of 16 and that only a set number of hours can organisation and its ability to meet consumer needs. communication is maintained at all times (Sethi et al., 2011).In a While Nike did establish strategies