posted 2017-Oct-22, 1:18 pm AEST DMZ is correct here.

(All 64-byte packets is unrealistic, but theoretically possible.) Any reason why you want/need a Cisco IOS router for at home? DS Channel1 DS Channel0 US Channel1 US Channel0 I use an EdgeRouter X, and I have it setup with multiple IPSec site-to-site tunnels with Cisco routers. 132 people = 7.75mbps per house!!!! posted 2017-Mar-7, 10:44 pm AEST

posted 2017-Oct-24, 12:11 pm AEST Get a 1941W, running ZBF the 800 series will be relatively close to the limit, the numbers published by Cisco aren't too far off when it comes to the firewall performance.I wonder if it's the ppp encapsulation or the vdsl and if a combination of both, how much each uses? I run a business from home, and use SSL/IPSEC VPN for remote access.I don't believe it will have enough CPU to deal with a 50 or 100 Mb/s connection.Ok then so not a bug then. If you want to enable lots of services, the 4K will probably get you more performance / $.Also, with HFC in future you might be lucky and see plans higher than 100/40, they can easily offer up to gigabit over DOCSIS 3.1 like in New Zealand (if you only had FTTN I'd say stick with the cheaper C887VAW). posted 2017-Mar-8, 9:51 am AEST The 4321 supports 50 Mbps out of the box and is upgradable to 100 Mbps with the purchase of an additional license.This is the image you should be testing on :- The hardware is way overpowered. Cisco 2911-sec with 2.5Gb ram and VDSL module for FTTNIt will be perfectly fine, For home use you will have some ACL's maybe a zone based firewall with a few rules.

This can pretty much operate all features with next to no CPU load impact on the device, but the device is speed limited.Just as an alternative, you might consider something like an EdgeRouter or a Mikrotik box. But, it still doesn't seem to work. These things are remarkably capable for the price.With basic firewall rules that you'd find in a home setup, it can do the 1 Gbps aggregate. Some people win, some people lose.I have a 2600 series running on a 100mbps NBN service and it works just fine Typical Cisco BS. So this is the area i'm mainly wanting config for.

Purchased a Cisco 867VAE-K9 outright from another supplier. Archive View Return to standard view. 0 Helpful Reply. IDS is a performance killer. But it pulls it down just fine.

Services provided via NBN Co, Opticomm, Open Networks, Red Train, LBN Co, and TPG FttBhttp://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/c ... 34157.htmlWe have submitted the FTTN product spec to Cisco to see if they support the 25 or so criteria that NBN require, once they have come back to us, Exetel will consider submitting the relevant Cisco 800, and 1900 series model to be certified for use.↳   Anything else anyone wants to discusshttps://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-r ... ?t=2488909Seems the 877VA will handle PPPoE, so does Exetel deliver FTTN via IPOE or PPPoE?http://pingbin.com/2014/09/cisco-887va- ... iguration/I haven't given any thought to it, but this http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/r ... index.html

I just want to ask if anyone know how to configure the static IP from NBN into the cisco router, or if there is no way of achieving this. I used the sample Cisco NBN FTTN config from iiNet website. Do I really need to go to a 1941 to get 100Mbs?Which IOS version are you running, some versions can have processing bugs that result in abnormal CPU usage. if it was an Ethernet termination, it would probably be ok posted 2017-Mar-8, 9:29 am AEST

posted 2017-Apr-30, 2:32 am AEST

Disabling it reduces throughput obviously.Speed (kbps): 0 107735 0 44199The ISR G2 lineup will go as fast as its hardware allows. posted 2017-Mar-7, 11:11 am AEST ref: whrl.pl/RePLZ0. It has hardware acceleration that you can disable/enable.

posted 2017-Oct-22, 1:18 pm AEST I'm Specifically looking at the ISR V2 which are latest.Firmware Source File Namep.s juniper srx110 ..... 19% cpu.... lol.... Telstra have supplied a standard "Telstra Gateway Pro" i.e. -------- ------ ----------As it stands, the 1941W is probably worth the extra investment. Cisco has always been a little bit cagey about their bandwidth numbers. To be honest they do feel about three generations behind the consumer market.Maybe contact Internode (or ask in their forum) what people are actually getting.